“What is your signature methodology?” I pose this question often in my calls with prospects and in my work with boutique consultancy clients.
In most cases, I get a fast and straightforward answer from high-performing consultancies. It’s usually something like, “We do X by utilising Y, which helps us deliver Z outcomes to our clients.”
How are they so prepared to answer this question? Because the signature methodology is one of the critical components of their success. It’s a core element of their value proposition and one of their most significant selling points.
On the other end of the spectrum are boutique consultancies that are struggling: the ones where consulting leaders and owners are overwhelmed, where team members are either overworked or underutilised, where growth is unsustainable or non-existent, where profit margins are far below industry standards.
It comes as no surprise that I get very different answers in such conversations. Either there is no signature methodology, or the one in place is not strong enough to acquire and retain new clients.
While I have discussed signature methodologies on multiple occasions, I’ve always considered it one of the foundational elements of success in a boutique consulting business. However, this foundational element deserves its own article.
So in this article, I’ll explore what a signature methodology is, why it is crucial for boutique consultancies to develop one, and how they can go about doing so.
All of this is based on my experiences and hundreds of conversations, assessments, and discoveries I’ve conducted over the years.
A signature methodology (SM) is a unique and proprietary approach developed by a consultancy to solve specific problems or address particular challenges their clients face. This methodology encapsulates the consultancy's expertise, processes, and best practices distilled into a structured framework.
Without a repeatable signature methodology, a consultancy tends to underperform.
I know that it’s a bold statement. However, I am deeply convinced that boutique consultancies can only perform at the highest level with a crystal clear value proposition combined with a repeatable, signature methodology. That’s the reason why I spend much time with my clients developing these signature methodologies.
The absence of a standardised approach leads to higher process variability and inconsistent, unpredictable outcomes. Clients today are seeking reliability and certainty more than ever before.
Recommended reading: Defining The High-Performing Boutique Consultancy
Here’s why every boutique consultancy needs a well-defined SM and why I consider it ‘underperformance’ if these objectives aren’t met.
Here’s why every boutique consultancy needs a well-defined SM and why I consider it ‘underperformance’ if these objectives aren’t met.
Without these advantages, I am convinced a boutique consultancy is likely underperforming.
Missing out on these critical aspects almost always leads to deteriorating performance, such as lower project margins, inconsistent quality, inefficiencies, and a lack of trust and differentiation in the market, leading to higher new client acquisition costs.
To develop a signature methodology, boutique consultancies need first to determine:
An SM’s strength is its ability to deliver consistent, high-value results across various client projects. The real key to success is the mindset of the consultancy owner, who must embrace the power of repetition. Repetition is not just a process—it's the essential bridge that deepens expertise and reinforces the effectiveness of a signature methodology.
By focusing on the same narrow list of problems for a highly targeted audience day in and day out, a consultancy achieves expertise clarity, resource optimisation, data aggregation and streamlining, pattern identification and recognition, opportunity discovery, and easy knowledge transfer.
In short, there’s no SM without an obsessive commitment to repetition.
Recommended reading: Why Repetition Is the Path to Becoming a High-Performance Consultancy
Based on my meticulous notes throughout client work, first-hand observations, and personal experience setting up my signature methodology, I recommend that boutique consultancies ensure the following three components are in place:
As part of an SM, the discovery service is a standardised initial phase where the consultancy thoroughly assesses the client's current situation.
This phase involves in-depth discussions, data collection, and analysis to comprehensively understand the client's needs.
The primary purpose of the discovery service is to identify the root causes of the client's problems and to outline a roadmap for addressing them.
By investing time in this well-designed preliminary step, the consultancy can ensure that subsequent solutions are highly relevant and practical, setting the foundation for a successful engagement.
Recommended reading: Every Consulting Firm Needs a Discovery Service
The second component of a signature methodology is problem resolution & delivery.
This phase involves structurally designed and standardised processes to solve specific problems and achieve desired outcomes. It includes a delivery methodology with clear standard operating procedures (SOPs) to ensure consistency and quality.
A key watch-out: Many consultancies try to differentiate the delivery by claiming to always be "on time, on budget, on scope”, which are just table stakes. That’s what clients always expect.
The third component of an SM is client development. This phase involves ongoing support, follow-up, and adoption programs to ensure clients achieve sustained success.
This structurally designed and standardised component should be introduced from the outset during the discovery service presentation, creating trust and illustrating the entire journey or program to the client.
So what happens when a boutique consultancy offers multiple services? Does it mean it needs multiple signature methodologies?
Short answer: Yes
Longer answer: If services are within a specific overarching expertise and are interconnected/adjacent, creating each subsequent signature methodology will be significantly easier. Many of the processes and tools used will most likely be applicable with minor adjustments. However, if these services are diverse and disconnected, it will most likely require developing signature methodologies from scratch for each.
I’d like to stress that developing and maintaining a signature methodology is not a quick or easy task. The effort of developing and maintaining signature methodologies for disconnected services is exponentially bigger. Therefore, I advise boutique consultancies to first fully reflect on the complexity of running a multiple-service (or diversified) consultancy.
In my experience, a narrow focus is the winner of the signature methodology game!
A well-defined signature methodology is more than a nice-to-have for boutique consultancies. It's an essential component for sustained success and growth. It provides a framework for consistency, efficiency, and scalability, which in turn leads to higher client satisfaction, more robust retention rates, and improved profitability.
Without it, consultancies will likely struggle with inefficiencies, inconsistent outcomes, and an inability to differentiate themselves in a competitive market.
Boutique consultancies prioritising and refining their signature methodology are better equipped to deliver consistent, high-impact results that drive their business forward.
Interested in receiving all my learnings to build a better consultancy?
Subscribe to my newsletter.