The Big Question
Questions I get from consultants. And my answers.
Question #3: I received this question from a reader (thanks!): "Luk, you teach 'narrow focus' and/or specialization as a consultant. But that would mean more income risk for me (covering fewer expertise domains). How to go about it?"
I know it's very tempting to cover multiple domains as a consultant, especially in difficult Corona-times. You are trying to keep all the options open, I get that (I've been there, got the T-shirt). Moving to a narrow focus is a scary exercise and requires guts and courage (and a certain financial buffer is helpful).
However, it's almost impossible these days to be successful if you keep focusing on multiple domains as a consultant. There’s too much saturation in the very crowded consulting market, too many competitors doing the same thing. It’s a losing battle in both visibility (search engines/online traffic) and trust-building with prospects . Your (focused) competitor is only 1 click away.
My short advice if you are covering multiple expertise domains: move to a more narrow focus step-by-step. It's less scary and you don't have to abandon everything at once. You can create special focus (e.g. cases, content, visibility, social proof, website, social profile, etc.) on your strongest expertise domain (your sweet spot) in small doses.
I am helping a few consultants as we speak with their migration to a narrow niche and they are leaving 'the old domains' behind in a (careful, but well outlined) fade-out approach, gradually growing their single-domain visible authority. You can easily copy such a progressive, iterative approach.
I am working with a few other consultants and they are merging some of their key expertise areas in a smart and unique (narrow) 'blend'.
Every problem has a solution. There are no rules here, just clever approaches. But I am 100% sure: you will never regret having narrowed your consulting focus!
An interesting question for the next edition:
I received this question from a reader (thanks!): "What would be the most ideal status as a visible authority I could strive for? I mean the kind of 'success measures' of a visible authority." (Cool question!)
Would you like to send a question for one of the following newsletter editions? Send it to me here.